Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Bava Kamma 132:5

אמר ליה רבא וליטעמיך הא דתניא (ויקרא טו, ה) משכבו ולא הגזול

Now, what were the circumstances? If we assume before Renunciation, why do I require a text, since this is quite obvious?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That a stolen object could not be brought to the altar. ');"><sup>9</sup></span> Should we therefore not assume after Renunciation, which would show that Renunciation does not transfer ownership?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In contradiction to the view expressed by Rabbah. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse